ahab.ews

Category: News

  • Bitcoin and Ethereum Spot ETFs See Roughly $509 Million in Outflows on Sept. 25

    Bitcoin and Ethereum Spot ETFs See Roughly $509 Million in Outflows on Sept. 25

    What happened? Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs saw big, sudden outflows on Sept. 25, with roughly $258M leaving BTC products and $251M leaving ETH products.

    Investors pulled hundreds of millions from both Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs after a volatile stretch that included a brief rebound the day before. BlackRock’s IBIT drew fresh money, but several major issuers like Fidelity, Bitwise and Grayscale faced heavy redemptions. Ethereum ETFs have now bled for four straight days, contributing to more than $500M in outflows over that period.

    Who does this affect? ETF holders, fund issuers and traders across the crypto market are the main parties feeling the impact.

    Retail and institutional investors who hold these ETFs may see increased short-term volatility and potential losses as assets under management shrink. Fund providers that lose flows will face pressure on fees, positioning and marketing as money shifts to stronger products like IBIT. Traders and leveraged participants are also at higher risk of forced liquidations if prices move further on these outflows.

    Why does this matter? These outflows weaken market support and raise the odds of deeper price pullbacks and more volatile trading in crypto markets.

    When ETFs experience large redemptions, there’s less institutional buying pressure to absorb sell-side activity, which can push prices lower. Technical indicators already point to bearish momentum for BTC and ETH, so continued outflows could trigger further liquidations and test key support levels. Prolonged weakness could slow institutional adoption and make asset allocation to crypto more cautious, increasing overall market volatility.

  • SharpLink Gaming to Tokenize Its Equity on Ethereum With Superstate, Expanding On-Chain Real-World Assets

    SharpLink Gaming to Tokenize Its Equity on Ethereum With Superstate, Expanding On-Chain Real-World Assets

    What happened?

    Nasdaq-listed SharpLink Gaming announced it will tokenize its equity directly on Ethereum using Superstate to manage the process, marking a major treasury-backed move into on-chain equities. Superstate — which oversees over $800 million in RWA funds and the $617 million USTB treasury fund — is expanding from tokenized treasuries into tokenized stocks. The announcement comes as SharpLink holds about 837,230 ETH (roughly $3.26 billion) and Ethereum’s RWA total value locked tops $9 billion.

    Who does this affect?

    This affects institutional investors, corporate treasuries, and funds that are exploring tokenization as a way to issue and trade real-world assets on-chain. It also matters for ETH holders, DeFi protocols, custody providers, and exchanges because tokenized equities increase on-chain settlement and custody demand. Retail traders and market participants watching ETF and institutional flows could see shifts in where big capital goes and how liquidity rotates across crypto markets.

    Why does this matter?

    It strengthens Ethereum’s role as the leading network for real-world assets, which can boost long-term on-chain demand for ETH as more institutions use it for settlement and liquidity. That added demand, combined with large ETH treasuries and rising RWA TVL, could help stabilize price action and set up rebounds from key support zones (around $3.3k) toward $5k and potentially higher. In short, wider adoption of tokenized stocks can deepen liquidity, increase ETH’s utility, and tilt the market outlook more bullish if institutional inflows continue.

  • Google backs $1.4B in Fluidstack leases for Cipher Mining, signaling tech giants’ push into AI/HPC Bitcoin infrastructure

    Google backs $1.4B in Fluidstack leases for Cipher Mining, signaling tech giants’ push into AI/HPC Bitcoin infrastructure

    What happened? Google agreed to backstop $1.4 billion of lease obligations for Fluidstack in exchange for a roughly 5.4% stake in Cipher Mining.

    It’s part of a larger $3 billion, 10-year agreement where Cipher will provide 168 MW of high-performance compute at its Barber Lake site, with room to expand to 500 MW. The deal locks in long-term contracted revenue for Cipher and brings big-tech capital directly into Bitcoin mining infrastructure. This follows Google’s recent investment in TeraWulf and shows a clear push by tech giants into the mining/HPC space.

    Who does this affect? Cipher Mining and Fluidstack benefit directly, while other miners, AI hosting firms, and investors are watching closely.

    Cipher gains both capital and a multi-year revenue contract, and Fluidstack gets backstopped leases and guaranteed compute capacity. Other miners like CleanSpark and Hive, plus companies building AI infrastructure, could win as the sector attracts more capital. Crypto traders and institutional investors will likely re-evaluate exposure as mining stocks that tie to AI demand may decouple from pure BTC price moves.

    Why does this matter? The move could shift market dynamics by re-rating miners as AI/HPC infrastructure plays and attracting more institutional capital.

    Big, long-term contracts can smooth revenue for miners and make their stocks more attractive relative to volatile Bitcoin exposure. If more tech and Wall Street money flows into miners with AI use cases, mining equities could outperform BTC and draw fresh institutional inflows. That said, Bitcoin’s short-term technicals remain weak, so price volatility could continue even as the sector’s fundamentals improve.

  • Texas Brothers’ Minnesota Crypto Heist Highlights Custody Risks and Demand for Safer Storage Solutions

    Texas Brothers’ Minnesota Crypto Heist Highlights Custody Risks and Demand for Safer Storage Solutions

    What happened?

    Two Texas brothers reportedly held a Minnesota family at gunpoint for nine hours and forced the father to transfer roughly $8 million in cryptocurrency. They used assault weapons, zip ties, and an accomplice who guided them to additional funds at a cabin. Investigators traced rental cars, receipts, and surveillance that led to the brothers’ arrest days later.

    Who does this affect?

    The immediate victims are the family who lost funds and suffered trauma, and the local community that was disrupted during the standoff. Any crypto holder with visible on-chain wealth or poor custody practices is now at greater personal risk from targeted violence and theft. Exchanges, custodians, security firms, and law enforcement are also impacted as demand rises for better protection and investigative resources.

    Why does this matter?

    High-profile, violent crypto thefts raise the perceived risk of holding large crypto balances, pushing more people toward custodial services, hardware wallets, or converting to fiat. That shift increases security and custody costs, can reduce liquidity if large holders move assets offline or sell, and may widen trading spreads. Regulators and insurers are likely to tighten rules and raise premiums, which could slow some retail activity but also speed up professionalization and institutional adoption of safer custody solutions.

  • PIPE Price Gravity Drives Declines in Crypto Treasury Stocks

    PIPE Price Gravity Drives Declines in Crypto Treasury Stocks

    What happened?

    CryptoQuant warns that crypto treasury companies that raised capital via PIPE deals are seeing their stocks snap back toward the cheap PIPE issuance price and can fall sharply. We’ve already seen dramatic examples like Kindly MD (NAKA) and Strive (ASST) where shares surged on crypto pivots and then collapsed — NAKA plunged about 97% back to its PIPE price. The retracements are driven by dilution and heavy selling pressure when PIPE lock-ups expire, a phenomenon researchers call “PIPE price gravity.”

    Who does this affect?

    This mainly affects small-cap public firms that used PIPE financing to accumulate crypto or rebrand as treasury plays, along with their retail and institutional shareholders. Companies such as NAKA, ASST, CEP and other PIPE-backed treasuries are most exposed when investors dump shares after lock-ups lift. It also impacts lenders and the broader market since several firms are taking on debt to buy back stock, a sign of strain for companies trading below the value of their crypto holdings.

    Why does this matter?

    This matters because PIPE overhangs can drive big losses and sap confidence in the crypto-treasury trade, potentially knocking many stocks down 50% or more. With roughly one in four public Bitcoin treasuries trading below NAV and NAV multiples falling, widespread selling could compress valuations across the sector and push investors toward holding crypto directly instead of equities. Unless there’s a strong, sustained Bitcoin rally to absorb the selling, expect continued declines, more debt-fueled interventions, and higher volatility that could spill into related small-cap and SPAC markets.

  • UK launches two-year pilot for tokenized sterling deposits with six major banks and Quant Network

    UK launches two-year pilot for tokenized sterling deposits with six major banks and Quant Network

    What happened?

    UK Finance kicked off a two-year pilot for tokenized sterling deposits (GBTD) with six major banks and Quant Network to build the technical backbone. The trial, running until mid-2026, will test programmable commercial bank money for payments, remortgaging and wholesale bond settlement. It builds on the Regulated Liability Network experiments and aims to modernize the UK’s payments and settlement infrastructure.

    Who does this affect?

    The project directly involves big banks (Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest, Nationwide, Santander) and fintechs like Quant, plus market infrastructure providers. It also impacts businesses and consumers using payments and mortgage services, and institutional investors trading bonds and tokenized assets. Regulators and new market entrants will be affected too, since the pilot relies on private‑public collaboration and could change access to financial plumbing.

    Why does this matter?

    If it works, tokenized sterling could speed up settlements, cut fraud and reduce the cost of failed transactions while enabling programmable money and new services. That efficiency could unlock liquidity and attract institutional capital into tokenized real‑world assets, helping initiatives like digital gilts and LSEG’s token platforms scale. The market impact could be significant—lower costs, more innovation and deeper markets—but wider adoption hinges on clear rules, reliable tech and investor trust.

  • Story Protocol IP Token Slumps 50% After Hype-Fueled Rally

    Story Protocol IP Token Slumps 50% After Hype-Fueled Rally

    What happened?

    Story Protocol’s IP token plunged about 50% in 24 hours, falling from an all-time high near $14.99 to roughly $7.25 after aggressive profit-taking. The drop came after a fast 120% rally from about $5.58 that was fueled by hype around the Origin Summit in Seoul. Once the event buzz faded, weak fundamentals and heavy selling pushed the price sharply lower.

    Who does this affect?

    Retail traders and early investors who bought into the rally face big unrealized losses and heightened panic selling. Venture backers and funds that poured money into the project — including big names like a16z and other investors — now see the project’s valuation under scrutiny. Creators, partners, liquidity providers, and other IP-token projects also risk reputational damage and reduced demand for tokenized IP models.

    Why does this matter?

    This crash shows that event-driven pumps can evaporate quickly when a project’s fundamentals don’t support a huge market cap, prompting a broad re-rating of similar high-valuation, low-revenue crypto plays. With Story Protocol carrying about a $2.27 billion market cap but only ~$29 million TVL and roughly $679 in daily revenue, nervous markets may pull back from tokenized-IP projects and tighten funding. The technical break and risk of further drops toward $5 (or lower targets like $4.75 and $3.46) could trigger more stop-loss selling and spill over into other speculative tokens.

  • South Korea Crypto Market Posts $24 Billion Outflow in Six Months as Trading Volumes Collapse

    South Korea Crypto Market Posts $24 Billion Outflow in Six Months as Trading Volumes Collapse

    What happened?

    South Korea’s crypto market lost about $24 billion in six months as domestic crypto holdings fell from KRW 121.8 trillion to KRW 89.2 trillion and daily trading volumes plunged. Investors actively withdrew funds from exchanges, with deposits dropping from KRW 10.7 trillion to KRW 6.2 trillion, even while Bitcoin and global crypto prices rose. Many retail traders shifted money into domestic stocks and stable assets, causing trading activity on local crypto platforms to collapse.

    Who does this affect?

    Retail investors and the country’s roughly 10.86 million active trading accounts are directly impacted, with many reducing crypto exposure and reallocating to equities. Crypto exchanges, related crypto firms and miners are seeing lower volumes and revenue, while banks and institutional players preparing to enter the market face both opportunity and transition costs. Local governments and tax authorities are also involved, seizing assets for unpaid taxes and changing enforcement, which affects holders and service providers.

    Why does this matter?

    The big outflows and collapsing volumes reduce local liquidity, raising the risk of larger price swings and making the Korean market more disconnected from global activity. At the same time, government moves to reclassify crypto firms as venture companies, approve spot ETFs and back won-stablecoins could lure institutional capital back and change market structure. In short, expect short-term pressure on prices and trading, but meaningful regulatory and bank adoption could trigger renewed inflows and reshape where liquidity and pricing power sit.

  • WLFI Announces Full Buyback and Burn Plan Using Treasury Fees to Stabilize Token After 58% Plunge

    WLFI Announces Full Buyback and Burn Plan Using Treasury Fees to Stabilize Token After 58% Plunge

    What happened?

    WLFI’s token plunged about 58% in September, prompting the team and governance to push a full buyback-and-burn plan to stop the freefall. The project will funnel 100% of treasury liquidity fees from its POL pools on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Solana into market buybacks and then burn those tokens. The community overwhelmingly approved the move and the team says every buyback and burn will be posted and verifiable on-chain.

    Who does this affect?

    This directly affects WLFI holders and traders who faced big losses and are watching for signs of price stabilization. It also matters to liquidity providers, protocol users on Ethereum, BNB and Solana, and anyone with exposure to DeFi projects that tie tokenomics to platform fees. Indirectly, other crypto projects and investors tracking buyback strategies will be watching how well WLFI’s plan works.

    Why does this matter?

    Buybacks and burns can create immediate buying pressure and reduce circulating supply, which may stabilize WLFI’s price in the short term and boost scarcity-driven value. But the move uses protocol revenue and may only offer temporary relief if it doesn’t fix underlying adoption or utility, so markets will test whether this builds lasting confidence. If it works or fails visibly, expect other DeFi projects and token issuers to copy or rethink similar treasury-driven buyback strategies, changing demand dynamics across tokens.

  • Crypto Market Slump Deepens on ETF Outflows and Waning Investor Sentiment

    Crypto Market Slump Deepens on ETF Outflows and Waning Investor Sentiment

    What happened?

    The crypto market slid as prices dropped and investor sentiment turned sharply negative. Global market cap fell about 2.2% to $3.83 trillion, with nine of the top 10 coins down and Bitcoin and Ethereum trading near $109k and $3,895 respectively. Large ETF outflows and profit-taking by long-term holders, plus a plunge in the Fear & Greed index, signaled broad selling pressure and higher volatility.

    Who does this affect?

    This move hits traders, institutional ETF investors, and holders who were banking on continued momentum. Short-term traders face increased liquidation risk and volatility, while ETF managers and institutional buyers saw big net outflows that reduce immediate buy-side support. Companies and investors planning crypto treasury moves also face added scrutiny from regulators, which can complicate adoption and capital flows.

    Why does this matter?

    It matters because weaker sentiment and ETF outflows can amplify a downward move and change market dynamics. With profit-taking by long-term holders and fading inflows, key support levels for BTC and ETH are now at greater risk, raising the chance of a deeper correction. If outflows and regulatory pressure persist, institutional confidence could wane, slowing new investment and making it harder for prices to recover.