ahab.ews

Blog

  • Bitcoin vs Gold: The Debate Over Store of Value and Its Investment Implications

    Bitcoin vs Gold: The Debate Over Store of Value and Its Investment Implications

    What happened?

    The debate over whether Bitcoin or gold is the better store of value has intensified, with more professionals increasingly favoring Bitcoin. A recent infographic and data show people still search for and buy gold more than Bitcoin, but Bitcoin posted slightly higher 12‑month returns while being much more volatile. Gold’s market cap is massive (around $27.6 trillion) and new annual gold supply (~$680 billion) far exceeds Bitcoin’s new issuance (~$24 billion), underlining very different supply dynamics.

    Who does this affect?

    This matters to investors across the board: younger people (18–39) are more likely to invest in crypto while older investors (50+) prefer gold. It also affects asset managers, ETF providers, market makers, and producers who respond to shifts in demand and flows. Big holders like pension funds and central banks should pay attention because changing allocations could influence liquidity and risk in both markets.

    Why does this matter?

    Bitcoin’s capped supply means relatively small capital inflows can cause big price moves, making it a potentially higher‑return but riskier store of value. Gold’s huge market size and steady new supply make it a more stable, defensive asset that needs many buyers to keep prices up. If more professional money flows into Bitcoin, expect greater volatility and larger capital shifts that could reshape portfolio diversification and market dynamics.

  • OKX Launches Pay and Card in Brazil Linking Stablecoins to PIX and Cutting Remittance Costs

    OKX Launches Pay and Card in Brazil Linking Stablecoins to PIX and Cutting Remittance Costs

    What happened?

    OKX launched OKX Pay and OKX Card in Brazil, letting users save and pay using USD-denominated stablecoins and a Mastercard debit that draws from those balances. The service links to PIX for instant BRL-to-stablecoin conversion and supports Apple Pay and Google Wallet. OKX also offers up to 10% APY on stablecoin balances and says the setup cuts typical fees on transactions compared with traditional remittance and payment services.

    Who does this affect?

    Everyday Brazilians, especially households and small businesses seeking inflation-resistant savings and cheaper cross-border payments, stand to benefit most. People who send remittances, travel internationally, or already use crypto will see lower FX and payment costs, while banks and money-transfer companies could lose fee revenue. Regulators and tax authorities may also have to pay closer attention as dollar-denominated stablecoins move into mainstream use.

    Why does this matter?

    This move accelerates dollarization via stablecoins in a big, fast-growing market and should boost stablecoin liquidity and transaction volume in Brazil and across Latin America. By cutting FX spreads and IOF-related costs, OKX could force traditional remittance firms and banks to lower prices and drive more users onto crypto payment rails. Wider adoption may attract more investment into crypto infrastructure, change local FX demand, and trigger greater regulatory scrutiny as capital flows shift.

  • Solana ETFs Draw Inflows as Infrastructure Upgrade Delivers Faster, More Reliable APIs

    Solana ETFs Draw Inflows as Infrastructure Upgrade Delivers Faster, More Reliable APIs

    What happened?

    Investors poured more than $280 million into new U.S. Solana ETFs in just six trading days and BSOL alone attracted about $417 million, with analysts forecasting as much as $5 billion in inflows over the next year. Alchemy rebuilt Solana’s infrastructure — new RPC and Streaming APIs that offer 20× faster archive calls, double throughput, and 99.95% uptime. The overhaul is meant to fix long-standing data and reliability issues that forced developers into costly workarounds.

    Who does this affect?

    Institutional investors and ETF managers gain a cleaner, regulated on-ramp to Solana exposure and staking yields. Exchanges, wallets, analytics platforms and builders benefit from faster, more reliable APIs that cut downtime and engineering complexity. Retail investors and staking participants also stand to see easier access to SOL products and potentially smoother user experiences.

    Why does this matter?

    Higher reliability and performance reduce the operational risk that kept many institutions on the sidelines, making Solana a more credible venue for big money. Combined with accelerating ETF adoption, that could bring sustained capital inflows (analysts’ $5B estimate) which lift demand, liquidity, and market depth for SOL. If Solana can handle institutional and mass-market traffic, it may attract more real-world payment projects and trading activity, shifting market dynamics and potentially supporting higher prices and lower volatility over time.

  • Galaxy lowers its 2025 Bitcoin target to $120,000, signaling a maturity era for the market

    Galaxy lowers its 2025 Bitcoin target to $120,000, signaling a maturity era for the market

    What happened? Galaxy cut its 2025 Bitcoin target to $120,000 and said the market is entering a “maturity era.”

    Galaxy lowered its year-end target from $185,000 to $120,000, citing an expected shift to lower volatility and slower appreciation. The firm pointed to a $19 billion liquidation tied to US‑China tariff tensions and rising interest in competing assets as drivers for the revision. Bitcoin briefly dipped below $100,000 and is now trading near $103,000 as markets digest the update.

    Who does this affect? Institutional investors, treasury companies, and retail traders are the main groups impacted.

    Institutions and structured investment vehicles are likely to play a bigger role in driving future inflows, reducing reliance on retail-driven rallies. Public companies holding Bitcoin may need to prioritize operational performance over speculative gains tied to BTC price moves. Retail traders face muted interest and greater sensitivity to liquidity shocks after the recent deleveraging event.

    Why does this matter? The change signals a market shift that could lower short-term upside but increase long-term stability and institutional adoption.

    A lower target and an emphasis on a maturity phase imply smaller, steadier returns rather than rapid bull-market spikes, which could cool speculative capital into crypto. Capital may flow into alternatives like gold, AI-linked equities, and stablecoins, reducing short-term demand pressure on Bitcoin. Still, stronger institutional absorption and a technical higher‑low structure could support sustainable recovery toward $120,000 if liquidity and sentiment improve.

  • Franklin Templeton Launches Hong Kong’s First Luxembourg-Registered Tokenized Money-Market Fund Invested in Short-Term U.S. Government Securities

    Franklin Templeton Launches Hong Kong’s First Luxembourg-Registered Tokenized Money-Market Fund Invested in Short-Term U.S. Government Securities

    What happened?

    Franklin Templeton launched Hong Kong’s first Luxembourg-registered tokenized money-market fund that invests in short-term U.S. government securities. The fund represents shares as blockchain tokens and was built with partners including HSBC and OSL to speed transactions and record ownership on a distributed ledger. It’s initially open to institutional and professional investors, with a retail version planned pending approval from Hong Kong’s SFC.

    Who does this affect?

    Institutional investors, wealth managers, banks, and licensed crypto platforms in Hong Kong are the first to get direct access to this tokenized product. If the SFC approves a retail version, ordinary investors could soon buy tokenized money-market shares, widening access to digital asset investment tools. Regulators, custodians, and firms building digital settlement rails will also be affected as they adapt to new tokenization workflows and compliance requirements.

    Why does this matter?

    Tokenization can cut settlement times, increase transparency, and lower operational costs, making money-market investing more efficient and potentially cheaper. Wider adoption could spur secondary markets for tokenized funds, push banks to integrate tokenized deposits and stablecoins, and accelerate Hong Kong’s bid to be a global digital-asset hub. That competition and infrastructure build-out could change how funds are distributed and traded globally and attract new capital into tokenized real-world assets.

  • Trump Praises Crypto as He Signals US Policy Shift Toward Bitcoin Reserve and Stablecoins

    Trump Praises Crypto as He Signals US Policy Shift Toward Bitcoin Reserve and Stablecoins

    What happened?

    President Trump praised crypto at a Miami forum, saying it “takes a lot of pressure off the dollar” and declaring the U.S. the “bitcoin superpower” and “crypto capital of the world.” He said his executive orders ended the federal “war on crypto,” and the administration is pushing ideas like a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and wider stablecoin use. The speech and related Republican backing have accelerated talk of using crypto in official policy while drawing pushback from critics worried about conflicts of interest.

    Who does this affect?

    This affects crypto companies, stablecoin issuers, and bitcoin holders who could benefit from friendlier U.S. policy and potential government reserves or partnerships. It also matters to investors and traders because shifts in rhetoric and policy can change flows, liquidity, and volatility across crypto markets. Regulators, lawmakers, and countries with weak currencies are watching too, since U.S. moves could alter global capital flows and the role of the dollar.

    Why does this matter?

    Market-wise, it’s important because bitcoin tends to move opposite the dollar, so promoting crypto as easing dollar pressure could ironically strengthen the dollar and hurt bitcoin’s rally. Fed data, rate expectations, and dollar strength have already shown they can knock bitcoin down even amid bullish crypto headlines, so policy talk can amplify market swings. At the same time, a U.S.-backed push for reserves or stablecoins could funnel big capital into U.S. markets, changing liquidity patterns, risk correlations, and how traders price crypto versus traditional assets.

  • Fed Ends Quantitative Tightening, Raising Liquidity and Bubble Risk Across Gold, Bitcoin and Long Duration Tech Before a Potential Selloff

    Fed Ends Quantitative Tightening, Raising Liquidity and Bubble Risk Across Gold, Bitcoin and Long Duration Tech Before a Potential Selloff

    What happened?

    The Fed announced it will end quantitative tightening on December 1, 2025 and shift to balance-sheet maintenance while redirecting agency income into Treasury bills. Ray Dalio says this move looks less like a technical tweak and more like the start of “stimulating into a bubble” because it comes alongside big fiscal deficits and strong private credit growth. He warns that this combo could send gold, Bitcoin and long-duration stocks much higher before an eventual sharp collapse.

    Who does this affect?

    Investors and traders in stocks, bonds, gold and crypto are likely to feel the impact most, especially holders of long-duration assets like tech and AI names. Savers and income-focused investors could see real returns squeezed as real rates fall and equity risk premia compress, while central banks and governments are implicated through increased gold buying and debt monetization. Borrowers and fiscal policymakers may get cheaper funding now but that raises the risk of a later painful tightening that could hurt leveraged players and institutions.

    Why does this matter?

    Market-wise, easier liquidity and potential rate cuts should push real rates down, compress risk premiums and inflate P/E multiples, creating a liquidity-driven “melt-up” in risk assets and inflation hedges. That can lift gold and Bitcoin sharply and drive speculative excess in tech, but it also leaves fixed-income and income investors with poor yields and elevated risk. The net effect is higher odds of big gains followed by a violent unwind, so positioning and risk management become critical for investors and institutions.

  • Australia sanctions North Korean hacking groups over massive crypto thefts

    Australia sanctions North Korean hacking groups over massive crypto thefts

    What happened? Australia sanctioned North Korean hacking groups behind massive crypto thefts.

    Australia announced sanctions on four DPRK-linked hacking groups — Lazarus, Kimsuky, Andariel and Chosun Expo — plus an individual tied to the attacks. Canberra says these actors stole at least A$1.9 billion in cryptocurrency in 2024 and used a global network to launder the proceeds, with thefts continuing into 2025. The sanctions aim to choke off funds used for North Korea’s weapons programs and to punish large-scale cyber-enabled theft.

    Who does this affect? Crypto firms, exchanges, compliance teams, users and North Korea’s illicit finance networks.

    The measures directly target the DPRK groups and anyone who receives or moves their stolen coins, so exchanges and wallet providers will be pressured to block linked addresses. Businesses and investors that handle cross-border crypto flows will need stronger AML/KYC screening to avoid sanctions risk. Ordinary users may see tougher onboarding rules and slower transfers as platforms ramp up compliance.

    Why does this matter? It raises regulatory pressure and could shake crypto markets and increase compliance costs.

    In the short term, markets may see volatility in tokens tied to mixing services or wallets as exchanges delist suspicious addresses and traders react. Higher enforcement and stronger screening will raise costs for platforms and could reduce liquidity in some assets, even as it makes the space safer for institutional investors. Over time, removing large-scale theft and laundering could lessen selling pressure from stolen coins and improve market confidence, but it will also accelerate global regulatory scrutiny.

  • Coinbase Pushes for Narrow GENIUS Act Rules to Protect Stablecoins and US Innovation

    Coinbase Pushes for Narrow GENIUS Act Rules to Protect Stablecoins and US Innovation

    What happened?

    Coinbase asked the US Treasury to keep GENIUS Act rules tight and true to Congress’s original intent. It warned against broad definitions that would pull in developers, validators, or open-source projects and said exchanges’ rewards aren’t the same as banned interest. The company also pushed for payment stablecoins to be treated like cash equivalents for simpler tax and accounting rules.

    Who does this affect?

    Stablecoin issuers and big exchanges like Coinbase are directly affected by how the rules are written. Developers, blockchain validators, and open-source protocol teams could avoid new regulation if the Treasury follows Coinbase’s narrow interpretation. Everyday users, DeFi platforms, and international businesses that use dollar-backed stablecoins would feel the ripple effects through access, fees, and available services.

    Why does this matter?

    How the Treasury implements the GENIUS Act will determine whether US-issued stablecoins stay competitive globally and how easy it is to build products around them. Clear, narrow rules would lower compliance costs and encourage innovation in the US, while overbroad rules could push projects and liquidity offshore. Those outcomes will influence market liquidity, adoption rates, pricing in crypto markets, and the dollar’s role in digital payments.

  • Robinhood Takes a Wait-and-See Approach to Crypto on Its Balance Sheet as Trading Surges

    Robinhood Takes a Wait-and-See Approach to Crypto on Its Balance Sheet as Trading Surges

    What happened?

    Robinhood said it’s not rushing to put crypto on its balance sheet and is taking a wait-and-see approach. CFO Shiv Verma said the company is “still thinking about it” and will weigh alignment with users against the best use of capital for shareholders. At the same time, Robinhood’s crypto trading business surged in Q3 and helped the company beat Wall Street revenue expectations.

    Who does this affect?

    This affects Robinhood shareholders and management decisions about where to deploy capital. It also affects retail customers who trade crypto on the platform, although they can still buy assets directly through Robinhood. And it matters to other firms considering digital-asset treasuries, since Robinhood’s caution could influence peer strategies and investor expectations.

    Why does this matter?

    Robinhood’s decision signals a pullback from the corporate-buying boom that supported Bitcoin and could remove a potential source of sustained demand. With crypto prices off their highs and market liquidity patchier, boards and risk committees may be less willing to take price risk on balance sheets. That could keep upward pressure on prices muted and contribute to thinner liquidity and higher volatility in the crypto market.